Now C4 admits NICK GRIFFIN Was Right!

BNP news reports that six years on, Channel 4 confirms Nick Griffin was right!

Channel 4’s Dispatches programme broadcast last night has confirmed the accuracy of Nick Griffin’s warning during his famous “free speech trial” six years ago, that the teachings of radical Islamist philosopher Abul A’la Mawdudi were being widely used in Britain as part of a subversion programme.

“I was put on trial for warning that radical Islamists posed a serious threat to Britain,” Mr Griffin told BNP News last night after watching the Channel 4 show.

During Mr Griffin’s trial — at which he was ultimately acquitted — he made reference to Abul A’la Mawdudi and his works, specifically the book Let us be Muslims published by the Islamic Foundation (UK) .

Mr Mawdudi’s teachings featured in the Channel 4 show which revealed how Islamists had used the pro-immigration and pro-multicultural positions of the establishment parties to seize control of Tower Hamlets borough council and to effectively take over parts of the Labour Party in East London.

The Islamists are also influencing the Conservative Party and the Liberal Democrats in particular, the show revealed.

“In my court case, I pointed out that even the so-called ‘moderate’ Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) was being influenced by Mr Mawdudi’s worldview,” Mr Griffin said.

At the time, the MCB’s Secretary General, Inayat Bunglawala, said he had a deep respect for Mawdudi and was quoted in the media as saying that “Mawdudi is a very important Muslim thinker. The book that brought me to practise Islam was Now Let Us Be Muslims by Mawdudi.”

“Mr Bunglawala is MCB media secretary and has written articles for the Times, Daily Telegraph, the Guardian, Daily Express, the Observer and the Sun,” Mr Griffin said.

“He was also selected as one of seven ‘conveners’ for a Home Office task force with responsibilities for tackling extremism among young Muslims.”

However, a review of the opinions of Mr Bunglawala’s philosophical mentor, Mr Mawdudi, reveals precisely the thoughts which brought the “moderate” MCB official to Islam.

On the topic of Jihad, Mr Mawdudi wrote that the Islamic state should not be limited to just the “homeland of Islam” and that it was for all the world.

“Islam wishes to destroy all States and Governments anywhere on the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and programme of Islam regardless of the country or the Nation which rules it,” Mr Mawdudi wrote in Vol 2, No1 of his work, The Faithful Struggle.

“It must be evident to you from this discussion that the objective of Islamic ‘Jihad’ is to eliminate the rule of an un-Islamic system and establish in its stead an Islamic system of State rule. Islam does not intend to confine this revolution to a single State or a few countries; the aim of Islam is to bring about a universal revolution,” that book continued.

In regard to the non-Muslim, Mr Mawdudi wrote: “His very tongue which, on account of his ignorance advocates the denial of God or professes multiple deities, is in its very nature ‘Muslim’… The man who denies God is called Kafir (concealer) because he conceals by his disbelief what is inherent in his nature and embalmed in his own soul. His whole body functions in obedience to that instinct… Reality becomes estranged from him and he gropes in the dark” (Mawdudi, A., Towards Understanding Islam).

Mr Mawdudi also taught that the sovereignty of Allah and the sovereignty of the people are mutually exclusive (Abu al-A’la al-Mawdudi, Political Theory of Islam) and that therefore what he called “Islamic democracy” was the “antithesis of secular Western democracy which transfers hakimiya (God’s sovereignty) to the people” (Ibid).

“These are the teachings which underpin even the so-called moderate MCB,” Mr Griffin said. “It boggles the mind to think that I was put on trial for predicting that Islamists would set off bombs and that the teachings of Mr Mawdudi were being used as part of a deliberate plan to undermine Britain.

“I am, however, grateful that one establishment media channel has now at last woken up to the fact that I and the British National Party have been right all along,” Mr Griffin said.

“We warned years ago that Islamists were incompatible with Britain. Now, as the chickens are coming home to roost, the British public will see that we were right.”

Tory Candidate follows on From Roger Godsiff (New Labour)

As reported on this blog six months ago, a local New Labour candidate recommended that a disgruntled resident vote BNP, now a Black, London TORY candidate has stated on a leaflet "Nick griffin Is Right"

“Nick Griffin is right” says Black Tory candidate!

Loanna Morrison (left), the Conservative prospective parliamentary candidate for Bermondsey and Old Southwark, has caused division within the Tory Party after posting an anti-immigration message on the influential political website, Conservativehome. She wrote : “Britain is full, declares Nick Griffin at every opportunity, and he is right.”

This has launched a divisive debate within the ranks of Tory candidates with some demanding to be allowed to play the immigration card and others accusing their colleagues of being racist.

Tory leaflets put out in Romford claim the ‘floodgates have been opened’ and that immigration must be stopped. But these leaflets have been condemned by other Tories who say they are alarmist and misleading because they imply limits could be imposed on entrants from EU countries such as Poland and the Czech Republic when this would be illegal under EU law.

Cameron supporters quickly turned their fire on Romford MP Andrew Rosindell who immediately started backtracking and trying to distance himself from the leaflet.

“I did not write or approve this flyer. Immigration is an important issue but, as David Cameron has made clear, we must be careful with both the facts and the language we use. This flyer falls short on both counts, and I shall be pointing that out.” However, he was unable to explain why the leaflet stated that it was “promoted” by the MP himself.

Tim Montgomerie, editor of Conservativehome, said the anti-immigration issues was popular amongst Tory candidates:
“I have spoken to someone senior in central office who said more and more people were asking to put immigration on leaflets, and they were being allowed to do so,” he revealed to The Observer this morning.

Another Tory MP told the newspaper the issue was becoming a salient one:
“In 2001 it wasn’t registering at all. This time it is cropping up regularly on the doorstep,” he said.

While David Cameron is expected to reflect this in a speech in Brighton today where he will play the ‘patriotic card’, there was a stern warning from grandees of both main parties:

“If either party decide to push the button on immigration then the only beneficiary will be Nick Griffin and the BNP.”

Labour MP advises disillusioned constituent to Vote BNP

A friend of mine, who lives just outside of the Billesley ward in Springfield (but is in the block that our demographic wizards have 'moved' from here in order to make Billesley a more enriched area) was recently talking about the way his own life is suffering due to immigration, and how his own MP implied that his (my friends) only solution would be to vote for The British National Party in the future.

He recently sent an email to his MP Roger Godsiff as he was becoming increasingly concerned over the unruly behaviour of many of his enriched neighbours.

You may remember that Mr Godsiff was discovered to have claimed for bath mats, gardening equipment and more than £7,000 of property repairs on his office expenses, as revealed earlier this year in the Daily Torygraph.

Here is his email (submitted via writetothem.com), with his identity concealed as he is mindful of the possibility of reprisals. I must stress that he is not a member of the BNP and did not know I was until recently, and he showed me the email and the reply by his MP.

Name Withheld
Address withheld
Birmingham
West Midlands
B13 ???

Phone: withheld

Email: withheld

Monday 20 April 2009

Dear Roger Godsiff,

I, Sir, am becoming increasingly concerned with the behaviour and attitude of the public at large, in Birmingham.

I hate to admit it, but i am starting to become a little bit phobic toward the influx of 'Asian' peoples who have been populating our city in recent decades.

I am not particularly biased toward one race or whatever, I believe in 'live and let live' basically, but, i cannot help but notice the belligerent attitude and generally anti white culture that is now prevalent in this area.
I have seen numerous disputes recently (roads, shops, etc.) Where young Asians have harassed drivers, shopkeepers, people minding their own business.

I try not to get involved, but, i find, the ferocity, abuse, and confrontation is escalating out of all proportion.

This area is fast becoming a hot bed of strife and antiism which is rivalling the seeds of Nazism...

Name Witheld.

Now here is the letter of reply. Again, the identity of my friend is concealed

As you can clearly see, Mr Godsiff admits that he hasn't got the balls to discuss this in the houses of parliament and clearly offers my friend the option to come to us. My friend, however, is still in two minds on the subject.